How to Prepare for a Job Interview: A Complete Checklist
A 5-step job interview preparation checklist drawn from coaching studies, US federal hiring guidance and US and British rules on interview questions.

Reading interview advice and rehearsing an interview feel like the same kind of preparation, but only rehearsal has much evidence behind it. In a German experiment, students who practiced a complete simulated interview with feedback were rated higher by interviewers than students who studied the same advice on a screen.1
Good job interview preparation comes down to three moves: work out what the interview will score, prepare true stories that answer it, and rehearse them out loud before the day. Five steps put those moves in the order you will use them:
- Turn the job advertisement into a list of requirements
- Match each requirement to a true story
- Rehearse out loud and get feedback
- Prepare your questions, logistics and any adjustments you need
- On the day, lead with substance, then write things down
This guide goes deeper on the interview stage of starting a job search.
Interviews are scored against the job, so prepare from the job
A well-run interview is scored against what the job requires, which makes the job advertisement your best preparation document. The US Office of Personnel Management, which issues hiring guidance for federal agencies, describes highly structured interviews that put one fixed set of job-related questions to every applicant and rate each answer against set benchmarks of proficiency.2
Employers have good reason to use them: in a 2022 re-examination of decades of hiring research, Paul Sackett and colleagues found structured interviews the top-ranked selection method for predicting job performance.3
Picture the interviewer’s side. They hold a question tied to one requirement, such as handling competing deadlines, and a scale describing what a weak, adequate and strong answer contains. A pleasant but vague reply scores low however well it seemed to land, because nothing in it matches the scale.
Not every interview is this disciplined, and the less structured ones leave more room for impressions (step 5 below). That changes how much delivery matters, not what you should prepare.
Practice beats reading: what interview coaching studies found
Three studies of interview coaching, published between 2001 and 2016, point the same way: candidates who were coached or who practiced out loud were rated higher than those who prepared less or only by reading, though all three are small. None of them tested a reader preparing alone at home.
Think of someone who has read plenty about interview answers but never said one aloud. Asked about a difficult project, their first spoken answer wanders, and the result comes out as “it went well” instead of what changed. Reading shows you what good looks like; the interview asks you to produce it, live.
In a 2001 field study of police and fire promotion candidates, those who chose to attend a coaching session scored higher and tended to organize their answers better, and role-play went with higher scores beyond the coaching itself; people chose whether to attend, so this shows a link rather than proof.4 In a 2008 experiment that assigned people to three levels of coaching, those given more comprehensive coaching received higher interview ratings, partly explained by greater knowledge of how interviews work.5
The study
Limited evidence
Practice or reading? Langer and colleagues, 2016
Markus Langer and colleagues in Germany gave one group a complete simulated interview with a virtual interviewer and live feedback on eye contact, posture and voice. The other group read an e-learning course with the same content, and slightly more of it. In a mock interview afterward, rated by trained interviewers who did not know which group anyone was in, the practice group scored higher on interview performance (a moderate difference, d = 0.60), were judged more likely to get an offer, and reported less anxiety.1
Because both groups received the same information, the gap came from practicing rather than from knowing more, and the authors traced it mainly to better nonverbal behavior. The main caveats: the participants were students, the interview was a practice run with no job at stake, and the authors designed the training system themselves.1
The three studies credit different ingredients: better organized answers, more knowledge of how interviews run, and steadier delivery. What they share is practice rather than reading alone, and in the 2016 experiment the practice came with live feedback. What this means for you: once you know the basics, another hour of reading tips is likely worth less than an hour of answering questions aloud to a listener.
The job interview preparation checklist
Steps 1 and 2 build your material, step 3 is where the research is strongest, and steps 4 and 5 stop avoidable problems from wasting the work.
1. Turn the job advertisement into a list of requirements
Copy the advertisement and mark every skill, duty and quality it stresses, then boil them down to four to six requirements in your own words. Add what you can learn about the organization from its website, recent news and anyone you know there. No study we found has tested whether researching the employer helps, so treat it as sensible practice: it feeds the questions you will ask and your answer on why you want the role.
One advertisement, three requirements (an invented example)
An advertisement for a customer operations coordinator says the job involves working between the sales and support teams, juggling several deadlines, and using data to spot recurring problems. That becomes three requirements: coordinating across teams, prioritizing under pressure, and turning data into a fix. Each one now needs a story.
2. Match each requirement to a true story
For each requirement, pick one real episode: the situation, what you did, and what changed as a result. OPM describes two common question types: behavioral questions, which ask what you did in a past situation and rest on the principle that past behavior predicts future behavior, and situational questions, which ask what you would do in a situation like those on the job.2 A common way to order these stories is situation, task, action, result, often shortened to STAR.
- Mark the requirements: each skill or duty the advertisement stresses gets its own line
- Join each one to a true story: one strong story can answer two requirements
- Find the gap: a requirement with no story is where your preparation time goes
One strong story can answer two requirements. A requirement with no story is your gap: find a smaller example from a side project or volunteer work, or prepare how you would approach it, since a situational question may ask exactly that. Also prepare short versions of the questions most interviews include, such as introducing yourself and why you are leaving your current job.
3. Rehearse out loud and get feedback
Say every answer aloud, then run at least one complete mock interview with someone who plays the interviewer and tells you where an answer lost them. If no one is free, record yourself answering and watch it back, checking delivery (eye contact, pace, voice) as well as content.
4. Prepare your questions, logistics and any adjustments you need
Confirm the time, place, format and interviewers’ names; for a video interview, test the software the day before and keep a phone number to call if it fails. Then prepare two or three questions of your own. In Britain, Acas, the workplace advice service, advises employers to invite questions at the end of each interview, and tells those interviewing online to have a backup plan for connection problems.6
If you have a disability and need an adjustment, ask ahead. In Britain, Acas’s 2026 guidance says employers must by law ask interviewees to tell them about any reasonable adjustments they need.6 In the US, as of 2026, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) says the law requires employers to provide reasonable accommodation to job applicants with a disability, unless doing so would cause significant difficulty or expense.7
5. On the day, lead with substance, then write things down
Delivery counts, especially in looser interviews. A 2009 meta-analysismeta-analysis: A study that combines the results of earlier studies on the same question into one overall estimate. Pooling makes the estimate more precise, but it cannot repair the studies it pools: a meta-analysis of surveys is still survey evidence.Full entry in the glossary by Murray Barrick and colleagues found that appearance, impression management and verbal and nonverbal behavior were related to interviewer ratings, that unstructured interviews were particularly affected, and that what impresses in the interview does not necessarily show up in later job performance.8 Dress in line with the employer’s norms and speak clearly, but let the stories carry the answers.
Afterward, write down the questions you were asked and what you would answer differently. It starts your preparation for the next round or the next employer.
Before the interview
Nerves go with lower scores, and rehearsal helps
Interview anxiety is common, and it shows up in scores. A 2018 meta-analysis by Deborah Powell and colleagues, pooling 30 samples, found that candidates who reported more anxiety received somewhat lower interview ratings, with a weaker link in real interviews than in practice ones, and possibly none in some real ones. The authors point to one explanation: anxious people tend to spend attention on worrying thoughts, which leaves less for the question in front of them.9
In the room, that can look like wondering how you are coming across while the question is still being asked, then losing its thread halfway through your answer. The authors call the link a medium-sized effect for their field: enough to matter in a close race without deciding it. It is one more reason to rehearse: in the 2016 experiment, the group that practiced a full interview reported less anxiety afterward than the group that read the same advice.1
- Myth
- Standing in a power pose for two minutes before an interview changes your hormones and your performance.
- Fact
- A 2022 meta-analysis of 88 studies found that body positions shifted self-reported feelings but not physiological measures, and that the effect on behavior may be inflated by publication bias or outliers.
Those results come from Robert Körner and colleagues, who pooled body-position experiments in general rather than job interviews.10 Feeling better is not nothing, but rehearsal is the preparation with evidence that it improves how interviewers rate you.
Questions employers are told not to ask: US and British rules
As of September 2026, US federal guidance from the EEOC says employers generally cannot ask disability-related questions before a job offer, and treats questions about marriage, children or pregnancy as possible evidence of discrimination. The Equality Act 2010, which covers England, Scotland and Wales, stops employers asking most health questions until they have offered the job.
These are the same rules that shape what to leave out of a cover letter, applied to the conversation instead of the page. In the US, the EEOC’s starting point is that questions before hiring should stick to what is essential for judging whether someone is qualified, a judgment to which race, sex, religion, age and national origin are irrelevant. Federal and state equal opportunity laws do not clearly forbid questions on those subjects, but the EEOC notes that asking them may be used as evidence of intent to discriminate unless a business purpose justifies it.7 Disability is stricter: employers generally cannot ask disability-related questions or require a medical examination until after a conditional job offer, though they may ask whether you need an accommodation to perform a specific job duty.11 The EEOC lists questions about marital status, children, childcare arrangements, pregnancy and a spouse’s job as ones that may be regarded as evidence of intent to discriminate.12 This is federal guidance; states can add their own rules.7
In Great Britain, the Act’s section 60 says an employer must not ask about an applicant’s health before offering work. Only the Equality and Human Rights Commission can enforce that ban; your own claim would be for disability discrimination based on your answers. Section 60 does not cover Northern Ireland, where the Equality Commission for Northern Ireland is the place to ask.13 Acas tells employers they must not discriminate against an applicant because of protected characteristics, such as disability, sex, race, age, marriage and civil partnership, and pregnancy and maternity, and lists exceptions to the health rule, among them finding out whether you need reasonable adjustments to the assessment process.14
Say an interviewer, making small talk, asks whether you have children. You can answer, decline politely, or speak to what the question may be getting at, for example that you can meet the hours and travel the role needs. That choice is yours; decide in advance which you prefer. If you think a decision was based on your answer, in the US you can file a charge with the EEOC, generally within 180 calendar days, extended to 300 where a state or local agency enforces a similar law (for age claims, only a state law and agency count).15 In Great Britain, you must notify Acas before making an employment tribunal claim, and Acas will offer early conciliation.16 Elsewhere, your country’s equality body or employment ministry can explain the local rules; for advice on your own case, speak to an employment lawyer.
Which steps are tested, and which are only sensible practice
Rehearsal with feedback is the best-supported step, though every study behind it is small. Preparing from the job’s requirements rests on how structured interviews are built, and several popular steps, researching the employer among them, have not been tested at all.
| What it is | What the best evidence found | Evidence |
|---|---|---|
| Rehearsal with feedback | Rated higher than studying the same advice, in one small experiment with students in mock interviews | Trial, limited1 |
| Interview coaching | Fuller coaching went with higher ratings in one experiment; voluntary coaching went with higher scores for police and fire candidates | Experiment and field study, limited, abstracts only54 |
| Preparing from the job’s requirements | Structured interviews score job-related answers and rank first among hiring methods for predicting performance | Re-analysis of meta-analyses, moderate3 |
| Lower interview anxiety | More anxiety went with lower ratings, a medium-sized effect for the field | Observational meta-analysis, moderate9 |
| Delivery and appearance | Related to interviewer ratings, especially in unstructured interviews, not necessarily to later job performance | Meta-analysis, moderate8 |
If time is short, do the requirements and the rehearsal first.
The bottom line
Saying your answers out loud to someone who will tell you where they lost the thread is the hour of interview preparation with the most research behind it. Build those answers from the job advertisement, one true story per requirement, and know before you walk in which questions the employer should not be asking.
This article is general information, not legal advice. Rules differ by country and change over time; for your own situation, speak to a qualified lawyer or an official advice service where you live.
Frequently asked questions
Should I memorize my interview answers word for word?
Memorize the points of each story, not a script. The US Office of Personnel Management describes structured interviews that follow each set question with probing follow-up questions, which no script can anticipate. In a 2001 study of police and fire promotion candidates, better-organized answers went with higher scores, so rehearse the order of your points and say them in fresh words each time.
Is paid interview coaching worth it?
We found no study comparing paid coaching with a free mock interview run by a friend or a careers service. The coaching studies we found tested group sessions and a computer simulation; what they share is practice rather than reading alone. A friend who will be honest can play the interviewer and tell you where an answer lost them, which gives you practice plus feedback, the combination the best-tested study used.
How far ahead should I start preparing for an interview?
We found no research that sets a best amount of time. A practical order is to map the requirements and draft stories as soon as the interview is booked, run at least one full rehearsal a few days before, and keep the last day for logistics and a light run-through. The coaching studies tested rehearsal, not timing, so treat these intervals as suggestions.
Sources
- Dear Computer, Teach Me Manners: Testing Virtual Employment Interview Training. Langer, M., König, C. J., Gebhard, P. & André, E. (2016). International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 24(4), 312-323; funded by the German Federal Ministry for Education and Research
- Structured Interviews. US Office of Personnel Management, Assessment and Selection guidance (accessed 2026-09-24)
- Revisiting meta-analytic estimates of validity in personnel selection: Addressing systematic overcorrection for restriction of range. Sackett, P. R., Zhang, C., Berry, C. M. & Lievens, F. (2022). Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(11), 2040-2068
- Interviewee coaching, preparation strategies, and response strategies in relation to performance in situational employment interviews: An extension of Maurer, Solamon, and Troxtel (1998). Maurer, T. J., Solamon, J. M., Andrews, K. D. & Troxtel, D. D. (2001). Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(4), 709-717
- The effect of coaching interviewees on subsequent interview performance in structured experience-based interviews. Tross, S. A. & Maurer, T. J. (2008). Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 81(4), 589-605
- Interviewing job applicants. Acas (Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service), UK; page last updated 30 June 2026, accessed 2026-09-24
- Prohibited Employment Policies/Practices (including Pre-Employment Inquiries). US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (accessed 2026-09-24)
- What you see may not be what you get: Relationships among self-presentation tactics and ratings of interview and job performance. Barrick, M. R., Shaffer, J. A. & DeGrassi, S. W. (2009). Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(6), 1394-1411
- Meta-analysis of the relation between interview anxiety and interview performance. Powell, D. M., Stanley, D. J. & Brown, K. N. (2018). Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 50(4), 195-207
- Dominance and prestige: Meta-analytic review of experimentally induced body position effects on behavioral, self-report, and physiological dependent variables. Körner, R., Röseler, L., Schütz, A. & Bushman, B. J. (2022). Psychological Bulletin, 148(1-2), 67-85
- Pre-Employment Inquiries and Disability. US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (accessed 2026-09-24)
- Pre-Employment Inquiries and Marital Status or Number of Children. US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (accessed 2026-09-24)
- Equality Act 2010, section 60: Enquiries about disability and health. UK Parliament, legislation.gov.uk (up to date with changes in force on or before 24 September 2026, accessed 2026-09-24)
- Recruitment: following discrimination law. Acas (Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service), UK; page last updated 30 June 2026, accessed 2026-09-24
- Time Limits For Filing A Charge. US Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (accessed 2026-09-24)
- Early conciliation: what it is. Acas (Advisory, Conciliation and Arbitration Service), UK; page last updated 30 January 2026, accessed 2026-09-24
How we researched this
We searched PubMed, Crossref and the web in September 2026 for experiments, field studies and meta-analyses on interview coaching, interview anxiety and self-presentation, and read US EEOC and OPM guidance, Acas guidance and the Equality Act 2010, checked current on 24 September 2026. Research sources date from 2001 to 2022. Main limitation: coaching studies are few and small; three papers were read as abstracts only, and one experiment as its accepted manuscript.


