Passive Income Scams: The Patterns Behind the Pitches

Passive income scams reuse 5 patterns, from returns that cannot fall to upsell ladders. How to spot each one, and where to report a scam by country.

An illustrated cover card headed “Passive Income Scams”, with the line “The patterns behind the pitches”. Line drawing of a bedroom at night with a moon in the window. On the bedside table a phone shows an advert with a sports car, a stack of coins and a steep upward arrow. An alarm clock and a glass of water sit beside it, next to the edge of a bed.

Retire in your twenties, make money in your sleep: those were among the claims that, according to a 2025 complaint by US regulators at the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the State of Nevada, salespeople used to sell trading courses and a place in a recruiting business called IM Mastery Academy. The complaint alleged the operation had taken more than US$1.2 billion from consumers since 2018.1

Passive income scams look different on the surface but reuse the same few patterns: a return that cannot fall, earnings claims nobody can check, income that really comes from recruiting, a cheap first step followed by costly upsells, and a promise that someone else will do the work. In 2025, consumers reported losing US$15.9 billion to fraud in data collected by the US FTC, and investment scams accounted for about half of it, more than any other kind. Those are only the losses people chose to report.2

Each pattern bends what passive income means in everyday use in its own way.

Money in your sleep is a sales line, not a business plan.

Why passive income scams run on the same few patterns

Passive income scams repeat because the persuasion behind them works, whatever the product. A 2006 study for the NASD Investor Education Foundation, now the FINRA Foundation, coded hundreds of undercover recordings of US fraud calls and found that investment pitches used more influence tactics than any other kind, led by false credibility, dangled riches and claims that people like you had already joined. Financial knowledge was not enough on its own: the investment fraud victims it surveyed scored higher on financial literacy questions than randomly chosen non-victims. The victims came from lists rather than a random sample, so the comparison is suggestive, not proof.3

The tactics aim at feelings rather than arithmetic. A 2024 evidence review by a committee of an FTC-led advisory group, whose members include industry as well as regulators and researchers, concluded that scammers stir up fear, excitement and urgency, and that people in that state may be less able to think critically.4

Picture a made-up group-chat post: a big payout from someone “just like you” (others have joined), a founder in a good suit (credibility), “only ten places left” (scarcity) and income that arrives overnight (riches). Swap crypto for online stores or courses and the levers stay the same, so one short set of questions, our own, covers most pitches:

Pattern What the pitch sounds like The question that exposes it
A return that cannot fall “Steady monthly gains, no risk” Where does the return come from, and can it fall?
Unprovable earnings “Students make five figures” How many buyers earned it, out of how many?
Recruiting as the product “Earn on every sign-up” Does the money come from customers or from recruits?
The upsell ladder “The next level is where the real money is” What does every later tier cost?
Done for you “Our experts handle everything” If it fails, whose money is lost?

A return that cannot fall is the first warning

Regulators flag the same thing again and again: returns that are high, promised as certain or said to carry little risk. Australia’s securities regulator, ASIC, warns on its Moneysmart site that scammers promise big returns at little or no risk, and points out that every legitimate investment carries some risk.5

The reason is simple: a real return has a source that can shrink. Interest depends on a borrower, dividends on a company’s profits, rent on a tenant. A return that never falls has no visible source, and the Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre (CAFC) describes a common hidden one: in a Ponzi fraud, early investors are paid with money from newer investors until the scheme collapses. The CAFC adds that fraudsters sometimes let victims withdraw a small amount, to persuade them to put in more.6

£880mreported lost to investment fraud in the UK in 2025, per City of London PoliceSource: Report Fraud (UK), April 2026A$837m+lost to investment scams in Australia in 2025, per the National Anti-Scam CentreSource: ASIC Moneysmart, August 2026C$704m+reported lost to all fraud in Canada in 2025; investment fraud was among the three costliest typesSource: Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre, March 2026

Official totals like these miss every loss nobody reports, so treat them as floors. In an invented but familiar sequence, a dashboard shows a steady monthly gain, a small withdrawal arrives on time, and a family adds its savings. The only real money in that story is the withdrawal.

So ask where the return comes from and what happens to it when markets fall. An answer you cannot check, or a promise that it cannot fall, is the warning itself.

Earnings claims nobody can check

An honest earnings claim comes with its denominator: how many buyers earned that much, out of how many. US law already demands this in one corner of the market: sellers covered by the FTC’s 2011 Business Opportunity Rule must put any earnings claim in a written statement giving the number and percentage of past buyers who earned at least the amount claimed, and must show written proof on request. The catch is coverage: the rule reaches only sellers who promise to provide customers, accounts, outlets or locations, or to buy back your output, and the rule’s official text still carried that narrow definition in September 2026.7 In January 2025 the FTC proposed extending it to business coaching and investment opportunities.8

The FTC’s allegations against IM Mastery Academy show what a missing denominator looks like. According to the FTC’s complaint, the company kept no records of whether its customers succeeded, and its own data showed 60 percent stopped paying for its trading training within a month.1 In May 2026 the main defendants agreed to a proposed settlement that would require them to surrender assets valued at nearly US$90 million and ban them from selling trading training and investment opportunities.9

Picture a video in which a seller says “I made five figures last month with this system.” Whether that one person is honest matters less than how many buyers did the same. Earnings-claim rules vary by country, so readers outside the US should look up what their own regulator demands.

Ask for the denominator in writing. A seller who cannot say how many buyers earned the figure has already answered the question.

When the real product is recruiting

If most of the money you are promised would come from signing up other people rather than from customers who want the product, the offer has the shape of a pyramid. The CAFC describes pyramid frauds as focused mainly on recruiting other investors, and its guidance, last updated in January 2026, notes that pyramid selling is a criminal offence in Canada.6 Multi-level marketing sits close by; how to read an MLM’s own figures is covered in what MLM income disclosure statements reveal.

Left: customers pay for something they want. Right: each row is paid by the row that joined after it. Our framework, drawn from the CAFC and FTC descriptions cited here.

Our reading of the arithmetic: each row is paid by the row below it, so the scheme needs ever more newcomers, and the most recent joiners, the biggest row, have nobody left below them. The FTC says people who join pyramid schemes typically lose everything they invest.10

In everyday life it rarely looks like a pyramid. A friend invites you to a video call about a wellness brand; the products get a minute, and the rest is about “building a team” and the bonus you earn when each recruit buys a starter pack.

Follow one dollar of the promised income back to where it started. If it began as a newcomer’s joining fee rather than a customer’s purchase, the income depends on recruiting.

The cheap first step and the upsell ladder

A low entry price is often only the first rung. According to the FTC’s 2018 complaint against MOBE, short for My Online Business Education, buyers paid US$49 to start a “proven” online business program, were then pressed to buy membership packages costing thousands of dollars to continue, and eventually learned that the system was to sell the same memberships to others.11 In 2020 the operators agreed to pay more than US$17 million in settlements, and the scheme’s leader agreed to a proposed permanent ban on selling business coaching and investment opportunities.12

Why does a ladder work? Our reading: each payment makes the next one feel like protecting money already spent, the sunk-cost effectsunk-cost effect: The pull to keep putting time, money or effort into something because of what has already been spent on it, rather than because of what it will bring from now on.Full entry in the glossary in action, so the question quietly changes from “is this worth it?” to “how do I win back what I paid?” The FTC’s consumer guidance says to be ready for the upsell: if a coach or promoter asks for more money to help the business succeed, stop and talk to someone you trust.10

A made-up but typical ladder runs from a free webinar to a small starter fee, then a mentoring package, then an “inner circle” that costs more than all the rest combined, with none of those prices shown at the start.

Before the first payment, ask in writing for the full price of every later tier, and price the whole ladder rather than the first rung.

“We run it for you”: the done-for-you pitch

The done-for-you pitch sells an income stream that someone else will supposedly run: an online store, a route of cash machines, a managed trading account. The CAFC reports business opportunity frauds involving cash and payment machines where, after a high startup cost, buyers may not receive the machines or the sellers do not place them as agreed.6 The pitch moves the work, not the risk: you pay first, and any losses stay yours.

An invented example: a monthly email says your store is “launching soon”, then reports a few small sales, while the setup and management fees have already left your account. The operator is paid either way; you are paid only if the business works.

Newer wrappers reuse the same patterns. With a paid course, look for the earnings claim and the upgrade ladder. With crypto “yield”, ask where the return comes from. With a trading bot, ask for results across all users, not the best few.

Before paying anyone to run an income stream for you, find out whose name the store, machines or account will be in, and what you would be left holding if the operator vanished.

Does knowing the patterns protect you?

Learning the patterns helps, but the protection fades. In a pre-registered 2019 US experiment, a few minutes of lessons on fraud tactics made people much less keen on fake investment pitches, but only a reminder kept the effect going.

The study

Moderate evidence

Scam-tactic lessons put to a randomized test (Burke and colleagues, 2022)

Adults from a nationally representative US internet panel were randomly assigned to a three-minute video or a short text on five tactics common in investment fraud, or to no lesson, and then rated pitches adapted from real frauds alongside genuine ones. Right after the lesson, stated willingness to invest in the fraudulent pitches was about 40 percent lower than in the control group, with a much smaller change for the genuine ones. Six months later, people who had seen one lesson were no better than the control group; those who got a second lesson as a reminder at three months still were.13

The result is encouraging and modest at once: saying no in a survey is easier than saying no to a persuasive caller. A 2014 US field experiment with past fraud victims pointed the same way: people warned by phone, whether about the scam they later heard or about a different one, were less likely to accept a mock scam call outright two or four weeks later, although the warning about the same scam had faded by four weeks.14

The FTC advisory group’s review adds two practical points: prevention messages tend to be forgotten, though reminders help, and having another person to talk to may help someone step back from a pitch.4 That makes a short checklist, reread before any payment, more useful than a warning read once.

Reread this before money leaves your account

Where to report a scam, country by country

Report a suspected scam to your national fraud reporting service and, for anything sold as an investment, to your financial regulator. The routes below, checked in September 2026, are examples, not full lists.

Where you are Where to report
US ReportFraud.ftc.gov, run by the FTC, plus the attorney general’s office in your state and in the promoter’s state10
UK Report Fraud, through its website or by phone on 0300 123 2040 (in Scotland, Police Scotland on 101); suspicious firms to the FCA on 0800 111 676815
Canada Your local police, and the Report Cybercrime and Fraud website or 1-888-495-8501, even with no money lost16
Australia Scamwatch, and a police report if money or personal information was stolen; call 000 in immediate danger17
Elsewhere Your national police or fraud centre, and your securities regulator; IOSCO lists its members’ contact details18
Myth
If no regulator has issued a warning about a firm, it is probably safe.
Fact
Warning lists are incomplete. IOSCO says not to assume a firm is authorized or legitimate just because no warning appears.

Safety comes first: if anyone is at immediate risk of harm, ring the local emergency number. Today, if money or card details have gone, contact your bank or card provider and ask it to stop any transactions, as Australia’s Scamwatch advises.17 If a loss brings thoughts of harming yourself, reach out now: your local emergency number works anywhere, and crisis lines include 988 in the US, the Suicide & Crisis Lifeline, which you can call or text,19 and Samaritans in the UK on 116 123.20 Within days, file the reports above, and expect follow-up offers to recover the loss in return for a fee; the UK’s FCA calls these recovery room scams.21 For choices that turn on your personal finances, a fee-only or regulated adviser can check the numbers with you.

The bottom line

Passive income scams change products quickly but patterns slowly: a return that cannot fall, a claim without a denominator, income from recruits, a ladder of upsells, a promise that someone else will do the work. One pattern is reason enough to pause, and no warning list proves an offer safe, so check the seller with your regulator before paying and report what you find.

This article is general education, not financial advice. For decisions about your own money, speak to a qualified, regulated adviser.

This article is general information, not legal advice. Rules differ by country and change over time; for your own situation, speak to a qualified lawyer or an official advice service where you live.

Frequently asked questions

Is every paid income course or coaching program a scam?

No, but the US FTC notes that there is no licensing requirement to become a business coach, and that scammers often lie about credentials. Its consumer guidance suggests researching the coach, reading testimonials skeptically, talking to former students and asking what you would sell, what it would cost and when you would expect a profit before paying.

Are official scam loss figures complete?

No. They count only losses people report. The Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre says only 5 to 10 percent of frauds in Canada are reported, and the US FTC told Congress in 2026 that the losses reported to it are a fraction of the real total. Treat national figures as a floor, and compare years with care, since reporting habits change too.

Can a legitimate investment pay a fixed rate?

Yes. Deposits and bonds pay stated rates, so a fixed rate alone is not a scam. The warnings are a rate well above normal or a promise of no risk. The Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre reports fake bonds and fixed-term deposits offered under the names of real firms, so check the firm through your regulator's own website, not the contact details in the offer.

What if someone offers to recover money I lost to a scam?

Treat it as a likely second scam. The UK's Financial Conduct Authority warns that previous victims may be offered their money back in exchange for a fee, the Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre reports the same pitch, and UK police describe fraudsters posing as law enforcement or recovery specialists. Report the contact to your national fraud service instead of paying.

Sources

  1. FTC, State of Nevada Take Action Against IM Mastery Academy for Deceiving Consumers. Federal Trade Commission (US), press release, 1 May 2025
  2. Prepared Statement of the Federal Trade Commission on The Rising Scam Economy: Modernizing Federal Approaches to Protect Americans from Foreign Fraudsters. Federal Trade Commission (US), testimony before the Joint Economic Committee of Congress, 25 March 2026
  3. NASD Investor Education Foundation Investor Fraud Study: Final Report. Consumer Fraud Research Group for WISE Senior Services and the NASD Investor Education Foundation (US) (12 May 2006)
  4. A Review of Scam Prevention Messaging Research: Takeaways and Recommendations. Scam Prevention Research Committee, Scams Against Older Adults Advisory Group, Federal Trade Commission (US) (April 2024)
  5. Investment scams. Moneysmart, Australian Securities and Investments Commission (Australia), last updated 17 August 2026
  6. Investment. Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre (Canada), page modified 16 January 2026
  7. 16 CFR Part 437, Business Opportunity Rule. Electronic Code of Federal Regulations (US), text up to date as of 24 September 2026
  8. FTC Proposes Rule Changes and New Rule to Deter Deceptive Earnings Claims by Multilevel Marketers and Money-Making Opportunity Sellers. Federal Trade Commission (US), press release, 13 January 2025
  9. Lead Defendants in the IM Mastery Academy MLM Scheme to Turn Over Tens of Millions of Dollars in Assets to Settle FTC Charges. Federal Trade Commission (US), press release, 13 May 2026
  10. When a Business Offer or Coaching Program Is a Scam. Federal Trade Commission (US), Consumer Advice, August 2022 (page metadata: modified 9 December 2025)
  11. FTC Action Halts MOBE, a Massive Internet Business Coaching Scheme. Federal Trade Commission (US), press release, 11 June 2018
  12. Defendants Responsible for International Business Coaching Operation to Pay More Than $17 Million in FTC Settlements. Federal Trade Commission (US), press release, 13 February 2020
  13. Can educational interventions reduce susceptibility to financial fraud? Burke, J., Kieffer, C., Mottola, G. & Perez-Arce, F. (2022). Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 198
  14. Forewarning reduces fraud susceptibility in vulnerable consumers. Scheibe, S., Notthoff, N., Menkin, J., Ross, L., Shadel, D., Deevy, M. & Carstensen, L. L. (2014). Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 36(3)
  15. UK victims lost £2.4 million a day to investment fraud in 2025. Report Fraud (UK), figures from the City of London Police, April 2026
  16. Fraud Prevention Month to bring hidden crime into the spotlight. Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre, Competition Bureau and RCMP (Canada), news release, 6 March 2026
  17. Report a scam. Scamwatch, run by the National Anti-Scam Centre (Australia), accessed 27 September 2026
  18. What to do when suspecting a scam. International Organization of Securities Commissions (IOSCO), accessed 27 September 2026
  19. Suicide Prevention. National Institute of Mental Health (US), last reviewed August 2026
  20. Where to get urgent help for mental health. NHS (England), page last reviewed 26 April 2023; content checked 27 September 2026
  21. Protect yourself from scams. Financial Conduct Authority (UK), first published 8 August 2017, last updated 19 January 2026

How we researched this

For this guide we read, in full and during September 2026, US FTC enforcement releases, testimony and rules, consumer guidance from the FTC, FCA, ASIC, the Canadian Anti-Fraud Centre and IOSCO, 2025 loss figures from US, UK, Canadian and Australian agencies, and three studies of fraud persuasion and prevention (2006 to 2022; one read as its 2021 working paper). Main limitation: all loss figures are self-reported, and most prevention evidence is from the US.

Last updated . Read our editorial policy.

Cite this article: WiserHours. (2026). Passive Income Scams: The Patterns Behind the Pitches. WiserHours. https://wiserhours.com/passive-income/passive-income-scams/. Tables and charts may be reused with a link back to this page.