Character Strengths: Using the VIA Survey to Do More of What Fits You
The free VIA character strengths survey ranks 24 strengths in 10-15 minutes. How to read your results, what trials found, and how it differs from Gallup's.

Taking the VIA character strengths survey is the easy part. It is a free online questionnaire that ranks 24 traits, such as curiosity, kindness and perseverance, from the ones most like you to the ones least like you.1 The harder part is what to do with the ranking, and here the research holds a surprise. A 2015 trial in German-speaking countries found that people who used their five lowest-ranked strengths in new ways gained about as much happiness as people who used their top five.2
So the list is a starting point for small experiments, not a verdict on who you are. To get real use from the VIA survey:
- Take the free survey when you have 15 quiet minutes
- Read your profile in bands
- Check your top five against your own life
- Use one strength in a new way each day for a week
- Bring a strength to a task you dislike at work
- Name strengths in the people you live with
Like the other tools for purpose and life design, the survey is worth taking only if the results reach an ordinary Tuesday.
What is the VIA character strengths survey?
The VIA character strengths survey, also called the VIA Inventory of Strengths, is a 96-question online questionnaire that ranks an adult’s 24 character strengths. The VIA Institute on Character says it was developed by psychologist Christopher Peterson, revised by the institute’s senior scientist Robert McGrath, and takes about 10 to 15 minutes.3
The 24 strengths come from a three-year project in which Peterson and Martin Seligman led 55 scientists, with the institute’s support. It produced the 2004 handbook Character Strengths and Virtues and the first adult and youth surveys. The institute, a non-profit based in Cincinnati in the US, now offers the survey free in many languages.4
Is the VIA survey free? Yes. After registering with an email address, which lets you pause and resume, you get a free ranked list of all 24 strengths.3 The University of Pennsylvania’s Authentic Happiness site, run by Seligman’s Positive Psychology Center, also offers a VIA Survey of Character Strengths to registered users.5
What costs money is the explanation. As of October 2026, the VIA Institute sells a Top 5 Report for US$19, an in-depth reading of your top five, and a Total 24 Report for US$49, which adds your middle and lesser strengths and an analysis by virtue.6 The institute presents the reports as upgrades of the same results, adding your raw scores and explanation rather than a new measurement, so start with the free list; it is enough for every step in this guide.
What are the 24 character strengths?
The 24 character strengths are traits the VIA Classification treats as morally valued, sorted under six broad virtues: wisdom, courage, humanity, justice, temperance and transcendence. The VIA Institute holds that everyone has all 24 in different degrees, so every profile is different.1
- Wisdom: creativity, curiosity, judgment, love of learning, perspective
- Courage: bravery, perseverance, honesty, zest
- Humanity: love, kindness, social intelligence
- Justice: teamwork, fairness, leadership
- Temperance: forgiveness, humility, prudence, self-regulation
- Transcendence: appreciation of beauty and excellence, gratitude, hope, humor, spirituality
The word “character” matters. These are not job skills or aptitudes; the institute describes them as capacities for thinking, feeling and behaving in ways that benefit you and other people.3 That is why the list includes forgiveness, humility and gratitude, which no aptitude test would measure.
Some strengths are also far more common than others. Peterson, Seligman and colleagues reported in 2005 that across 40 countries, from Azerbaijan to Venezuela, the strengths people most often rated “most like me” included kindness, fairness, gratitude and open-mindedness, while prudence, modesty and self-regulation were consistently among the lesser ones.7
In practice, if kindness tops your list and self-regulation sits near the bottom, you look like most people who take the survey, not like someone with a character flaw. What makes a profile yours is the strengths that rank unusually high for you.
- Myth
- Your bottom five VIA strengths are your weaknesses.
- Fact
- The VIA Institute calls them lesser strengths: ones you use, value or have developed less than your others, not flaws.
How accurate is the VIA survey?
The VIA survey is reliable enough for self-reflection, but it is a self-portrait. The VIA Institute’s own figures show acceptable internal consistency for most strength scales on the public version, the one you take online.8 Three limits matter more for how you read it.
First, every question in the public version is worded positively, a choice VIA made so that reversed items would not confuse test-takers.8 So a high score partly reflects how readily you agree that good things describe you.
Second, the six virtues are a tradition-based grouping more than a measured fact. In a 2015 analysis of more than a million cases from four samples, McGrath found the strengths cluster into three broader groups, caring, inquisitiveness and self-control, and noted that earlier studies had mostly found four or five groups.9
Third, ranks exaggerate small differences. The institute notes that your fifth, sixth and seventh strengths may be separated by a fraction of a point, that it breaks tied scores with an algorithm, and that the raw scores appear only in the paid reports.3 Strength number 5 and strength number 8 may be almost the same.
How to use the VIA survey results, step by step
Using VIA results well means turning the ranked list into small, specific changes to ordinary days. The steps start with reading the profile, move to the one exercise that has been tested in randomized trials, then to work and home, where the evidence is thinner and comes mostly from surveys.
1. Take the free survey when you have 15 quiet minutes
Answer for how you usually are, not how you want to be. If you are in the middle of a difficult period or a big transition, note that next to your results and consider retaking the survey once things settle.
2. Read your profile in bands
Mark your top five to seven, your bottom five and the middle. Because neighboring strengths can be nearly tied, a strength at number 7 may belong in your top band as much as number 5 does. If your list opens with curiosity, humor, fairness, kindness and love of learning, followed by hope and zest, treat all seven as candidates.
3. Check your top five against your own life
The VIA Institute treats a top strength as a “signature” strength when it feels like the real you, comes easily and energizes rather than drains you; some people have fewer than five, and many have more.3 For each top strength, write down one recent moment you used it. A strength you cannot place in any real moment may describe how you see yourself rather than how you act.
4. Use one strength in a new way each day for a week
This is the exercise tested in the trials described in the next section. Each day, use one strength somewhere you normally would not: curiosity in a dull meeting, by asking one real question; kindness toward a neighbor you only nod to; love of learning through a short read outside your field. Keep it small and new, and if it helps, keep going after the week. If a lesser strength interests you more, practice that one; the 2015 trial suggests it can work too.
A one-day version
Pick one strength from your top band, choose one place you would not normally use it, use it once, and note in a line what happened.
5. Bring a strength to a task you dislike at work
At work, the evidence comes mainly from surveys. In a 2017 study in Austria, medical students and resident physicians who said they applied their signature strengths more at work or in their studies also rated their wellbeing and mental health higher, though a one-time survey cannot separate cause from effect.10 A 2017 review of 18 experimental and quasi-experimental studies linked strengths programs to positive outcomes such as work engagement.11
So pick your most draining recurring task and redesign one part of it around a top strength. Someone high in creativity might turn a monthly report into a one-page visual summary; someone high in social intelligence might pair up for the dullest part of a project. Absorbing work of this kind is close to what the PERMA model calls engagement.
6. Name strengths in the people you live with
At home, the useful move is noticing strengths in others. In a 2018 set of studies of people in romantic relationships, those who appreciated how their partner used their strengths reported more relationship satisfaction and commitment, according to the abstract.12 These were correlational studies, so start small: once this week, tell a partner, child or housemate which strength you saw them use and what it made possible.
Your first strengths week
Strengths work best when tied to what you care about. If your top strengths and the core values you have named seem to point in different directions, let values decide what matters and strengths suggest how you pursue it.
Does using your strengths make you happier?
Using a strength in a new way each day for a week has given people a modest rise in happiness, lasting months, in online trials that began with Martin Seligman’s in 2005.7 Later trials complicate the story: in one, lesser strengths did about as well as top ones,2 and in another, so did a placebo exercise.13 The deliberate daily attention may matter more than the ranking.
The study
Mixed evidence
Six months after one week of new strength use: Seligman's 2005 online trial
Seligman’s team drew 577 adults from visitors to the website for his book Authentic Happiness and assigned them at random to one of six one-week exercises, one of them a placebo task of writing about early memories; 411 finished every follow-up. The group told to use a top strength in a new way each day reported more happiness and fewer depressive symptoms than at baseline at the one-month check and at every check through six months, while the placebo group’s gain had gone within a week. A lighter version, which only asked people to note their top five and use them more often, helped right after the exercise week and then faded. The average participant started out mildly depressed, and those who kept up the exercise unprompted gained most.7
Those volunteers had chosen to visit a happiness website and were mostly well educated, so some may simply have expected to feel better. The follow-up trials are what make the picture useful.
When Mongrain and Anselmo-Matthews at York University in Canada repeated the study in 2012, they used a better control condition and added a positive placeboplacebo: A dummy treatment, such as a sugar pill or a decaffeinated drink, made to look like the real one so that people in a trial cannot tell which they received. Comparing against it separates a treatment's effect from the effect of expecting to be treated.Full entry in the glossary, an exercise meant only to bring positive thoughts about yourself to mind. Their abstract reports lasting gains in happiness from the positive exercises they tested, but also from the positive placebo, and no advantage over the control for depression.13
In the 2015 trial, run from Switzerland, people received five strengths without being told whether these were their top or their bottom five. Compared with an early-memories placebo group, both groups showed small gains in happiness, which the authors report lasted up to three months, and both found the exercise equally enjoyable.2
Why would the bottom five work as well as the top five? The trials cannot say for certain, but they suggest the active ingredient may be paying fresh, deliberate attention to something good in yourself each day, more than finding the exact right strength.
Combined results are modest. Schutte and Malouff’s 2019 meta-analysismeta-analysis: A study that combines the results of earlier studies on the same question into one overall estimate. Pooling makes the estimate more precise, but it cannot repair the studies it pools: a meta-analysis of surveys is still survey evidence.Full entry in the glossary pooled trials of signature-strength exercises and found small effects on happiness and depression and a somewhat larger one on life satisfaction, according to its abstract.14 A 2019 reanalysis of earlier positive psychology meta-analyses found that once bias from small studies was taken into account, effects on wellbeing were small and effects on depression were not reliable.15 So if your strengths week feels pleasant but unremarkable, that fits the evidence: expect a gentle lift and keep only the habits you enjoy.
What is the difference between VIA and CliftonStrengths?
VIA and CliftonStrengths both rank your strengths, but they measure different things. VIA ranks 24 morally valued character traits for free, while Gallup’s CliftonStrengths, sold by Gallup and described here from the company’s own pages, ranks 34 talent themes in four domains through a paid assessment.16
| Question | VIA survey | CliftonStrengths |
|---|---|---|
| What it measures | 24 character strengths under six virtues | 34 talent themes in four domains: executing, influencing, relationship building and strategic thinking 16 |
| Cost | Free ranked list; paid reports optional | Paid assessment and reports 16 |
| Core idea | Character: ways of thinking, feeling and acting that benefit you and others | Talent: naturally recurring patterns of thought, feeling or behavior; in Gallup’s formula, talent times investment equals strength 17 |
Claims of benefit for both tools come largely from each organization’s own materials, so read them as marketing as well as information.
To understand what you are like at your best across work, family and friendships, VIA fits better and costs nothing. If your employer already uses CliftonStrengths for team planning, its shared vocabulary is a reason to take it. Treat either result as a description to test, never as a limit on the jobs you can do.
The bottom line
Your top band of VIA strengths matters more than any exact rank, and the free list is a reasonably reliable picture of how you see your own character. Trials suggest a week of using strengths in new, deliberate ways gives a small lift, whether or not they are your top five. Pick one strength and use it somewhere new tomorrow.
This article is general information, not medical advice. If you're worried about your health, talk to a doctor or another qualified professional.
Frequently asked questions
Can my VIA survey results change over time?
Yes, a little. The VIA Institute says the survey is repeatable, so most people get similar results on a retake, but strengths can shuffle within a band, and a new strength can enter your top five after a big change in life or self-understanding. The institute suggests retaking it every couple of years and treating any new top strength with curiosity rather than alarm.
Is the VIA survey a personality test?
The VIA Institute calls it a personality test of a particular kind: it measures 24 character strengths, traits that are valued morally across cultures, rather than broad personality types. It is a self-report questionnaire, so it shows how you see yourself, and it has no pass or fail. It does not diagnose anything.
Can children take the VIA survey?
Yes. The VIA Institute offers a separate free Youth Survey for ages 8 to 17, which a parent sets up from their own account; the English version has 98 questions and takes about 10 minutes. A paid Youth Report adds ideas for using the top strengths. For a group of students, a teacher can send invitations through the institute's professional dashboard.
What does a lesser strength mean on the VIA survey?
A lesser strength is one near the bottom of your profile. The VIA Institute stresses that these are not weaknesses: they are strengths you use less, value less, or have not developed yet, compared with your others. Everyone has all 24 to some degree, and a 2015 Swiss-run trial found that practicing lesser strengths in new ways also lifted happiness.
Sources
- The 24 Character Strengths. VIA Institute on Character (accessed 6 October 2026)
- Strengths-based positive psychology interventions: a randomized placebo-controlled online trial on long-term effects for a signature strengths- vs. a lesser strengths-intervention. Proyer, R. T., Gander, F., Wellenzohn, S. & Ruch, W. (2015). Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 456
- Frequently Asked Questions. VIA Institute on Character (accessed 6 October 2026)
- About the VIA Institute on Character. VIA Institute on Character (accessed 6 October 2026)
- Questionnaires (Test Center). Authentic Happiness, Positive Psychology Center, University of Pennsylvania (accessed 6 October 2026)
- Character Strengths Personality Reports. VIA Institute on Character (prices accessed 6 October 2026)
- Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. Seligman, M. E. P., Steen, T. A., Park, N. & Peterson, C. (2005). American Psychologist, 60(5), 410-421
- VIA Inventory of Strengths-P (VIA-IS-P), "VIA Survey". VIA Institute on Character (accessed 6 October 2026)
- Integrating psychological and cultural perspectives on virtue: The hierarchical structure of character strengths. McGrath, R. E. (2015). The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(5), 407-424
- Associations between the Application of Signature Character Strengths, Health and Well-being of Health Professionals. Hausler, M., Strecker, C., Huber, A., Brenner, M., Höge, T. & Höfer, S. (2017). Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1307
- Promoting positive outcomes through strengths interventions: A literature review. Ghielen, S. T. S., van Woerkom, M. & Meyers, M. C. (2018; online 2017). The Journal of Positive Psychology, 13, 573-585
- Personality strengths in romantic relationships: Measuring perceptions of benefits and costs and their impact on personal and relational well-being. Kashdan, T. B., Blalock, D. V., Young, K. C., Machell, K. A., Monfort, S. S., McKnight, P. E. & Ferssizidis, P. (2018). Psychological Assessment, 30(2), 241-258
- Do positive psychology exercises work? A replication of Seligman et al. (2005). Mongrain, M. & Anselmo-Matthews, T. (2012). Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68(4), 382-389
- The Impact of Signature Character Strengths Interventions: A Meta-analysis. Schutte, N. S. & Malouff, J. M. (2019). Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(4), 1179-1196
- Meta-analyses of positive psychology interventions: The effects are much smaller than previously reported. White, C. A., Uttl, B. & Holder, M. D. (2019). PLOS ONE, 14(5), e0216588
- What Are the 34 CliftonStrengths Themes? Gallup (accessed 6 October 2026)
- The Science of CliftonStrengths. Gallup (accessed 6 October 2026)
How we researched this
In October 2026 we read the VIA Institute's own pages on the survey, its reports and its assessments, Penn's Authentic Happiness test center, Gallup's CliftonStrengths pages, and peer-reviewed trials, reviews and meta-analyses published from 2005 to 2019. We read the 2005 and 2015 trials and the 2017 Austrian study in full; for the 2012 replication, the 2015 virtue-structure paper, the 2018 couples studies, the 2017 review and the 2019 meta-analysis of strengths exercises we had only the abstracts. Main limitation: nearly all studies rely on self-report questionnaires from online volunteers.



